Who is carrying what
Billable percentage: 79% against target ~75%.
- Timesheet completion: 77% against goal 95%+.
- Employee retention: 88% against floor 75%.
Team utilization
50%
Platform ledgerA number this platform computed from your connected, synced data. It is not read out of a single outside tool; the tool-badged chips cite those records directly.Computed from: Team roster · as of Oct 22, 2026Team roster · as of Oct 22, 2026
Carry and capacity read from Team roster, grouped by team. Open a person for what they own and anything at risk. The money side lives on the reporting board.
By team
Account Management · 2 · 54% utilization (time data covers 4% of the window)Creative · 2 · 95% utilization (time data covers 3% of the window)Finance · 1 · 0% utilization (time coverage not measured)Leadership · 1 · 0% utilization (time coverage not measured)Strategy · 1 · 68% utilization (time data covers 4% of the window)Technology · 1 · 69% utilization (time data covers 6% of the window)No department on file · 2 · 67% utilization (time coverage not measured)Over capacity
1Carrying more than their available hours. These are the people to move work off first.
Not judged
9Their capacity could not be measured, so nothing here says their load is fine. Each card says what is missing.
Utilization
50%
time data covers 3% of the window
Platform ledgerA number this platform computed from your connected, synced data. It is not read out of a single outside tool; the tool-badged chips cite those records directly.Computed from: Time tracking · as of Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026Time tracking · as of Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026
Timesheet completion
3%
99 of 3754 weekdays on staff
Platform ledgerA number this platform computed from your connected, synced data. It is not read out of a single outside tool; the tool-badged chips cite those records directly.Computed from: Time tracking · as of Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026Time tracking · as of Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026
Unassigned work
0
open and assigned to nobody
Platform ledgerA number this platform computed from your connected, synced data. It is not read out of a single outside tool; the tool-badged chips cite those records directly.Computed from: Tasks · as of Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026Tasks · as of Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026
Timesheets arrived on 99 of 3754 weekdays on staff in this window, which is 3%. Graded over 8 people; 2 more could not be graded because their employment record did not read, and they are in neither half of that fraction. 2 people logged time without a staff record and are counted apart rather than raising this figure.Population: 10 of 28 person entities on the roster (every person on record in this workspace, staff and contacts alike) entered this result; coverage PARTIAL: 18 of 28 roster entities never entered the population (unclassified 18).
57%
69%
70%
79%
61%
71%
47%
63%
63%
66%
69%
70%
74%
79%
1,251 h0 committed engagements
1,293 h0 committed engagements
1,293 h0 committed engagements
Available hours and committed engagements are shown side by side and are never divided into each other. Nothing in this workspace staffs a person onto an engagement for a number of hours, so a forward utilization percentage would be manufactured rather than measured.No grain in this workspace carries a forward booking, allocation or plan, so committed hours 1 to 3 months out are not knowable. Reported as unavailable rather than as zero: zero committed hours would render an idle team.canonical_engagements.auto_renew (migration 316) records renewal posture, and it is not in the served column set for this grain, so a term ending inside the horizon cannot be told apart from one that renews. Every term end below is a SCHEDULED TERM END and never a loss. Adding auto_renew to SERVING_SELECT_COLUMNS.engagementBilling is the one change that would resolve it.
6
5
4
4
1
0
0
Population: 44 of 44 task entities on the roster (every task on record in this workspace, assigned or not) entered this result; coverage FULL: every roster entity was reached.