Largest client share
Not enough history yet to compare week over week. With 3 readings recorded so far, movement for largest client share can first be shown on Aug 27.
Nothing to do. Values are recorded once a day and this fills in on its own.
Where it stands
No history to chart yet
only 1 measured period of history exist for this metric, and a trend needs at least 3. History builds as the daily capture runs. The chart appears once there are a few periods to draw.
Largest client share reads 31% against keep under 25%, which is outside its band. A quarter of the firm's income in one account is a single point of failure that also sets your prices.
- Window
- Stated as of Aug 23, 2026. The period the reading covers is set by its source and is not stated on this tile.
- How it is counted
- Each client's fee revenue over this period as a share of all the fee revenue we can attribute to a client. Pass-through costs rebilled to clients are left out on both sides, because a client who buys a lot of media is not the same as a client who funds the firm. Billing lines with no client we can resolve are excluded and reported separately rather than spread across the accounts that do resolve.
- Source
- Financial ledger, as of Aug 23, 2026
- Drivers
- Computed from this workspace's own records.
What this is
Share of earned income coming from your single largest client. Each client's fee revenue over this period as a share of all the fee revenue we can attribute to a client. Pass-through costs rebilled to clients are left out on both sides, because a client who buys a lot of media is not the same as a client who funds the firm. Billing lines with no client we can resolve are excluded and reported separately rather than spread across the accounts that do resolve.
Why it is on your dashboard
One account above a quarter of your income is not a great client relationship, it is a single point of failure that also sets your prices. The risk is rarely that they leave in anger. It is that a budget cycle, a new marketing director, or an acquisition removes a quarter of the firm's income in one quarter, and everything you would do about it takes longer than that. It sits on this board against keep under 25%.
Why it is where it is
This accounts for where this period's earned income comes from, all the earned income we can attribute to a client in all.
The largest account, at $430k of billed fee value. What matters about the biggest client is not the relationship, it is what happens to the month it leaves. Read this share as the size of the hole rather than as a measure of how well the account is going.
How this was measured: This client's fee revenue as a share of all the fee revenue the per-client read can attribute, over the same period the tile is measured on. Pass-through recharges are excluded on both sides, so a client who buys media is not counted as a client who funds the firm.
At $215k of billed fee value. An account this size is a real dependency even when it is not the largest, because two of them leaving in one quarter is one budget cycle, not two accidents.
How this was measured: This client's fee revenue as a share of all the fee revenue the per-client read can attribute, over the same period the tile is measured on. Pass-through recharges are excluded on both sides, so a client who buys media is not counted as a client who funds the firm.
At $190k of billed fee value. An account this size is a real dependency even when it is not the largest, because two of them leaving in one quarter is one budget cycle, not two accidents.
How this was measured: This client's fee revenue as a share of all the fee revenue the per-client read can attribute, over the same period the tile is measured on. Pass-through recharges are excluded on both sides, so a client who buys media is not counted as a client who funds the firm.
The rest of the book, shown as a remainder rather than broken out. A long tail is its own shape and it is not automatically healthy: accounts too small to matter still cost about as much to run as accounts that do.
These are shares of one whole, so each dollar of earned income is counted against exactly one account. That is what makes a point held by the largest client a point the rest of the book does not hold.
What we checked, in order
Not answered here.
There is no ruled order of checks for Largest client share yet. Three of these ordered diagnostics exist and they attach to the profit share, an account under the floor, and absorbed work. This metric is not one of them.
An ordered set of checks is worth more than a list of things to look at, because the order is what stops the most expensive move being tried first. Writing one for this metric is a decision about how it should be diagnosed rather than a gap in the data.
Root cause
A share this size arrives one of two ways and they need different answers. Either one account grew, which is usually the outcome of doing good work and is not a fault, or the rest of the book stopped growing around it, which is. The share alone cannot tell you which, because it is a ratio and both halves move it. What separates them here is Lumio Beverages at $430k against the accounts underneath it: Northwind Outdoor at $215k, Harbor and Pine Hospitality at $190k. If those figures held while the top one grew, this is the first reading. If they fell, it is the second, and the second is the one that needs a decision.
What to do now
Put an expansion conversation on Northwind Outdoor and Harbor and Pine Hospitality this month. Those are the accounts directly under Lumio Beverages, and concentration is fixed at the bottom of the list rather than at the top.
The move that does not work is managing the big account harder, because the share is a ratio and nothing you do to the numerator makes it smaller in the direction you want. The move that does work takes two or three quarters, which is why it has to start before anything goes wrong. Nothing about this month can be changed; what changes is the shape of next year.
This closes no measured driver above, and does not claim to.
What stops it coming back
Set a ceiling you are willing to live with, review it when you take on work rather than when you report on it, and treat a client approaching it as a signal to grow the accounts underneath.
Concentration is decided at intake and read at reporting, which is why it is almost always discovered too late to do anything cheap about. A ceiling chosen in advance turns it into a question asked while there is still time, and the number itself is yours to pick: what is safe for a firm with deep cash reserves is not safe for one without them. One thing to settle before picking it: the ceiling has to be a decision about Lumio Beverages, at $430k the largest account you already have. A ceiling set below where the book already sits is not a policy, it is a plan to end an account, and that is a different conversation to have on purpose rather than by arithmetic.
This closes no measured driver above, and does not claim to.
What happens if this is ignored
The risk is rarely that the client leaves angry, which at least comes with warning. It is that a budget cycle, a new marketing director, or an acquisition removes a quarter of the income in one quarter, and every response available to you takes longer than that. Firms that survive it are the ones that started growing the rest of the book while the big account was still happy. Where this lands is not this tile. It is Gross billings reads $2.00M, with no band set for it. There is no band set on that tile, so it can show you the movement and cannot tell you whether the movement is already too far. The risk here is not gradual. When a dominant account goes, it goes in one budget cycle, and the top line is where a quarter of the book leaving shows up first and largest.
Is this target still telling you anything
Not answered here.
1 captured month periods are stored against a window of 12.
Whether a target is set at a useful level is read over 12 periods, and this metric has 1 stored so far. This fills in on its own as the history builds.